Rethinking beacon logic with Cognitive C2

A conceptual view of how artificial intelligence can be used to add a layer of intelligence to command and control software.

Apr 07, 2025

In red team operations, stealth and adaptability is everything. Whether you're simulating an APT or testing the detection capabilities of a blue team, how and when your payload communicates can make or break the engagement. Traditional command and control (C2) setups rely on fixed intervals, static protocols, or predefined triggers—but what if your implant could think for itself?

Enter Cognitive C2. A new way of approaching red team communications by embedding artificial intelligence into implants. Inspired by the idea of making payloads environment-aware, this concept takes things one step further by allowing the C2 logic to be adaptive, intelligent, and stealthier.

Follow my journey of 100 Days of Red Team on WhatsApp, Telegram or Discord.

The problem with traditional C2

In most command and control software, beaconing behavior follows basic rules:

Sleep for x seconds, then check-in.
Use DNS, HTTPS, or HTTP to communicate.
Rotate through a list of servers or use hardcoded fallbacks.

This works well, but it’s also predictable. Blue teams can pick up on patterns like beacon timing or repetitive domain requests. Some detection engines even learn what "normal" traffic looks like over time and alert when something slightly abnormal shows up.

The question then arises how to make C2 communication feel natural, unpredictable, and contextual?

What is Cognitive C2?

Cognitive C2 is a concept where an implant doesn’t just follow instructions—it is capable of making decisions based on its environment. By integrating lightweight AI models, the implant can observe what’s happening around it and decide when and how to communicate.

Think of it as giving your C2 agent a brain.

How such a C2 will work?

The basic idea is to embed a light-weight machine learning model into the payload. This model continuously monitors the environment and uses that data to answer one question:
“Is it safe to beacon right now?”

Here’s what it might look at:

Is the user currently active? (mouse/keyboard movement)
Is the CPU or RAM being heavily used? (could indicate AV scans)
Are certain processes running? (like procmon.exe, Wireshark, or EDR tools)
Has the system been idle long enough?
Are any known sandbox behaviors present?

If the model thinks it’s safe, it allows the payload to connect back to C2. If not, it waits or shuts down. This makes the behavior much more contextual and adaptive.

Here's an overview of how this will work:

Won’t this increase the size of the C2 implant?

These agents don’t require large, complex machine learning models like the ones used for image recognition or natural language processing. Instead, they rely on extremely lightweight models—such as decision trees, logistic regression, or tiny neural networks with just a couple of layers. These models are small enough to be embedded directly into the payload, often taking up less than 100 KB of space. In many cases, the model's logic can be fully rewritten as simple if/else conditions, completely eliminating the need for any external ML libraries.

What about the target machine’s performance?

These C2 models only need to make simple decisions based on basic system telemetry—such as CPU usage, user idle time, or the presence of specific processes. These checks are neither computationally expensive nor frequent. A single model inference takes just a few milliseconds and can be scheduled to run at long intervals (e.g., every few minutes), minimizing any noticeable impact on the system.

These models don’t require any specialized hardware. They can run smoothly on regular endpoints, virtual machines, or even low-resource environments without triggering user suspicion or degrading system performance.

Red Team Notes
Cognitive C2 is a step towards a future, where implants are not static, dumb tools, but adaptive agents that understand when it's safe to act.